RSES
July 1, 2025
Let us revisit heat flow / cooling in the context of an actively convecting planet.
In rigid bodies, we have diffusion and heat production to worry about, but in fluids, heat can be carried from place to place by advection.
# General Observations on Convection
Definition: Convection is the transfer of heat by the self-organised movement of a fluid. Free convection is when the fluid is stirred entirely by rising buoyant material and sinking negatively-buoyant material. (Forced convection is produced when the fluid is stirred mechanically).
Convection is one of the ways we transfer heat from hot regions deep in the Earth to cooler, shallow regions. Convection is a form of heat engine that turns heat into mechanical work. This is important because it is the only process within the planet that can produce flow, and surface tectonism beyond simple, thermal contraction.
The heat flow in a system that is convecting is always larger than the heat flow would be if the fluid were not moving (all other things being equal). The heat flow is larger by a ratio that is called the Nusselt number or \(\textrm{Nu}\) and
\[ \textrm{Nu} \propto \textrm{Ra}^{1/3} \]
Where, \(\textrm{Ra}\), is the Rayleigh number
\[ \textrm{Ra} = \frac{g \rho_0 \alpha \Delta T d^3}{\eta \kappa} \]
What is the Rayleigh number / where does it come from ?
Rayleigh number - measures the intensity of the buoyancy forces and their ability to counter the effects of thermal diffusion and viscosity in damping motion driven by buoyancy
\[ \mathrm{Ra} = \frac{g \rho \alpha \Delta T d^3}{\eta \kappa} \]
Prandtl number - measures the relative importance of stress diffusion and thermal diffusion and is purely a material property (no reference to the geometry, length- or time-scales).
\[ \mathrm{Pr} = \frac{\eta}{\rho \kappa} = \frac{\nu}{\kappa} \]
Reynolds number - measures the relative importance of inertial to viscous forces. The Reynolds number is commonly used in fluid dynamics where it is an indicator of the transition from steady flow, unsteady laminar flow, through to turbulent flow.
\[ \mathrm{Re}=\frac{\rho V_0 d}{\eta} = \frac{V_0 d}{\nu} \]
The Reynolds number does not contain any reference to the thermal state but this means that there is no natural length/time scaling and so the definition can be subjective.
The (in)famous equation of fluid dynamics is the Navier-Stokes equation:
\[ \rho \left( \frac{\partial \mathbf{v}}{\partial t} + (\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) \mathbf{v} \right) = \eta \nabla^2 \mathbf{v} - \nabla p - g \rho_0 \alpha \left( T - T_0 \right) {\mathbf{z}} \]
\[ \left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial t} + \mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla T \right)= \kappa \nabla^2 T + \frac{H}{C_p} \]
We combine Navier-Stokes equation driven by thermal buoyancy, and the expression for the time-evolution of the temperature field. The two equations are coupled through \(T\). The various physical properties and their units are listed below.
\[ \begin{array} {l|l|l} \hline \textrm{Viscosity} & \eta & Pa \cdot s \\ \hline \textrm{Temperature scale} & \Delta T = T-T_0 & K \\ \hline \textrm{Lengths} & x & m \\ \hline \textrm{Thermal expansivity} & \alpha & K^{-1} \\ \hline \textrm{Gravity} & g & m.s^{-2} \\ \hline \textrm{Density} & \rho & kg.m^{-3} \\ \hline \textrm{Thermal diffusivity} & \kappa & m^2.s^{-1} \\ \hline \end{array} \]
We can’t hope to solve the Navier-Stokes equation, except in a few, trivial cases, but we can do something else. We do a form of dimensional analysis to write every symbol side-by-side with its basic units.
\[ \frac{\rho_0 \kappa}{d^2} \frac{D}{Dt'} \left( \frac{\kappa}{d} \mathbf{v}' \right) = \frac{\eta}{d^2} \acute{\nabla}^2 \left( \frac{\kappa}{d} \mathbf{v}' \right) - \frac{\eta \kappa}{d^3} \acute{\nabla} p' + g \rho_0 \alpha \Delta T T' {\mathbf{z}} \]
The equation then looks like this:
\[ \begin{aligned} \frac{\rho \kappa}{\eta} \frac{D\mathbf{v}'}{Dt'} & = \acute{\nabla}^2 \mathbf{v}' - \acute{\nabla} p' + \frac{g \rho_0 \alpha \Delta T d^3}{\kappa \eta} T' {\mathbf{z}} \nonumber \\ & \textrm{or} \\ {\frac{1}{{\rm Pr}}} \frac{D\mathbf{v}'}{Dt'} & = \acute{\nabla}^2 \mathbf{v}' - \acute{\nabla} p' + {{\rm Ra}} T' {\mathbf{z}} \end{aligned} \]
The new parameters in the equation are dimensionless ratios, and show how to expand the equation back to its original form.
Questions
Discussion points:
If the Prandtl number is very large, how long does it take for the Navier-Stokes equation to adjust to changes in buoyancy forces or boundary conditions ?
What is the Reynolds number for mantle flow / plate tectonics ? How about for flow in the Earth’s outer core ?
A similar scaling question: what (roughly) is the kinetic energy of the Pacific plate ?
In very-viscous convection, only the Rayleigh number plays a role (\(\mathrm{Re}\rightarrow 0\) and \(\mathrm{Pr} \rightarrow \infty\))

The structure of the flow and the pattern of the temperature field is predictable once we know the Rayleigh number but it is helpful first to develop some feeling for the patterns by seeing them.
Blue is cool, red is warm. The bottom of the box is kept hot, the top cold and the difference in temperature is \(\Delta T\), the depth of the box is \(d\) and so on. These numbers are set up so that the Rayleigh number is the required value. In a lab experiment, the simplest parameter to change is \(\Delta T\) assuming that the material has a constant viscosity with \(T\) and does not freeze, melt, burn or boil.
Rayleigh number: \(Ra=10,000\)
Rayleigh number: \(Ra=100,000\)
Rayleigh number: \(Ra=1,000,000\)
Rayleigh number: \(Ra=10,000,000\)
Rayleigh number: \(Ra=1,000,000\)
The pattern is not changed much when we make the box a little wider
Rayleigh number: \(Ra=1,000,000\)
Nor does it make a qualitative difference if we account for the Earth’s curvature

In the sphere, the patterns are harder to see by eye, but it turns out that we can draw general conclusions from the 2D cases and they still hold in 3D.

A relatively simple pattern emerges from the competition between advection of heat by fluid flow and diffusion:

Convection length and timescales are determined by the Rayleigh number.
We will see this picture again when we consider the patterns of heat flow in the Earth’s ocean floor.

The temperature (velocity, stress etc) profiles vary systematically with \(\mathrm{Ra}\).
It can be a little difficult to see from a small set of movies, but if we reduce the Rayleigh number enough, conduction completely wins over advection and no motion takes place at all.

This can be approached theoretically, and we find that there is a critical value of the Rayleigh number and a critical wavelength where this transition occurs.
\[\mathrm{Ra}_c = \frac{27}{4} \pi^4 = 657.51 \]
and
\[ k = \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{2}} = 2.22 \]
If \(\mathrm{Ra} \gg \mathrm{Ra}_c\) then convective motion is inevitable
Calculate the Rayleigh number for the Earth’s mantle.
\[\mathrm{Ra}_{\textrm{Earth}} = ?\]
Use the following values:
Convection is a heat engine (i.e. it converts heat energy into mechanical work)
Convection is a balance between heat transported by fluid motion and diffusion. The fluid self-organises to create large scale patterns “out of nowhere”
In tanks of viscous fluids like syrup or honey, convection depends on just the one free parameter which is a combination of fluid properties, geometry and boundary conditions — this is called the Rayleigh number (Ra).
If we know Ra, we can predict the heat flow and typical velocity of the system
If Ra is below a critical value, convection dies away but if it is more than (about) ten times this value then convection cannot be suppressed. The Earth’s mantle is very much super-critical and so it must be convecting.
None of these simple models actually produce plate tectonics but they do still tell us about the heat flow in the Earth.

EMSC - 3022 - 2025/S2